![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 8 of 8. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Glydin on February 16, 2005, at 13:39:57
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/20050212/msgs/458663.html
At the risk of a PBC or block, I find and feel this post is quite offensive and has no place on this forum.
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 16, 2005, at 19:30:26
In reply to Post needs reviewing, posted by Glydin on February 16, 2005, at 13:39:57
The question presented in Glydin's post concerns the acceptability or not of the post cited by Glydin in relation to the guidlines of the forum.
On one basis, we could examine the guidline for,{...jumping to a conclusion...}here.
The post cited by Glydin writes,[...they should have let him kill himself...]. Would this not be jumping to the conclusion that the person would have killed himself unless he took Zoloft?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 16, 2005, at 20:27:43
In reply to Post needs reviewing, posted by Glydin on February 16, 2005, at 13:39:57
The post in question cited by Glydin writes,[...the {mistake} was...].
If we examine the guidlines for,[...respecting the views of others...], could the statement fall into that because of the word, "mistake"?
Lou
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 16, 2005, at 20:34:26
In reply to Post needs reviewing, posted by Glydin on February 16, 2005, at 13:39:57
The post cited by Glydin can be examined to see if it advocates harm to someone.
Let us look at this part. [...they should have let him kill himself...]. IMO, regardless of what is written by the poster in front of that statement, I think that the statement at least has the potential to advocate killing onself on the basis, IMO, of the phrase, [...should have let him...].
Lou
Posted by gardenergirl on February 16, 2005, at 22:38:35
In reply to Lou's response to Glydin's post-shdhvlthm, posted by Lou Pilder on February 16, 2005, at 20:34:26
> The post cited by Glydin can be examined to see if it advocates harm to someone.
> Let us look at this part. [...they should have let him kill himself...]. IMO, regardless of what is written by the poster in front of that statement, I think that the statement at least has the potential to advocate killing onself on the basis, IMO, of the phrase, [...should have let him...].
> LouLou, this part you cited, which may appear to advocate the person killing himself, is what troubled me.
gg
Posted by gardenergirl on February 16, 2005, at 22:39:24
In reply to Re: Lou's response to Glydin's post-shdhvlthm » Lou Pilder, posted by gardenergirl on February 16, 2005, at 22:38:35
I felt troubled when I read that part of the post.
gg
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2005, at 9:51:22
In reply to rephrase... » gardenergirl, posted by gardenergirl on February 16, 2005, at 22:39:24
gg,
You wrote,[...I felt troubled when I read that...].
The question here is if the post in question can be determinaed acceptable here by Dr. Hsiung or not. I have not seen the post addressed as of yet and I think that the post could be determined to be unacceptable. Thank you for expressing that you were "troubled" after reading the part in question which gives some support for my writing that I think the post is unacceptable here.
Lou
Posted by AuntieMel on February 17, 2005, at 10:09:40
In reply to Lou's reply to gardenergirl-feltrbld » gardenergirl, posted by Lou Pilder on February 17, 2005, at 9:51:22
I think it's been addressed.
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.