![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 21 to 45 of 60. Go back in thread:
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 7:50:44
In reply to Re: So who is the F*ck You Fairy asper GG ? » scratchpad, posted by fayeroe on June 12, 2007, at 16:19:44
> my, my, i feel that a person sure could feel put down from this post......
You have been asked before to use the notify the administrators button rather than comment on a post's civility status on board.
Follow-ups regarding these issues should of course themselves be civil.
Dr. Bob is always free to override deputy decisions. His email is on the bottom of each page. Please feel free to email him if you believe this decision was made in error.
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 7:53:11
In reply to + whatta about these? oh, who can the poster be???, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 7:49:03
directly.
And please use the notify the administration feature about posts you believe to be uncivil.
Dinah, posting as deputy to Dr. Bob
Posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:30:17
In reply to Please notify the administrators » fayeroe, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 7:50:44
> > my, my, i feel that a person sure could feel put down from this post......
>
> You have been asked before to use the notify the administrators button rather than comment on a post's civility status on board.
>
> Follow-ups regarding these issues should of course themselves be civil.
>
> Dr. Bob is always free to override deputy decisions. His email is on the bottom of each page. Please feel free to email him if you believe this decision was made in error.i used it twice last night and then was just too tired to continue...........
>
>
Posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 8:34:25
In reply to Please notify Dr. Bob about deputy actions » dispatcher, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 7:53:11
I did notify and received no reply/no action taken.
Posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 8:34:43
In reply to who is the f u fairy?--a new zen koan to ponder..., posted by zenhussy on June 13, 2007, at 2:37:50
Happy to oblige. Though it couldn't have happened without the question being framed the way it was. A happy accident, I guess.
gg
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:39:37
In reply to Re: Please notify Dr. Bob about deputy actions, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 8:34:25
It sometimes takes time. Please be patient.
Dinah
Posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 8:40:03
In reply to Re: Please notify Dr. Bob about deputy actions, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 8:34:25
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:42:33
In reply to Re: Please notify the administrators, posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:30:17
It sometimes takes time. We might be conferring or asking guidance from Dr. Bob. We might be away from the computer. Or we might be sick with a whopping cold and unable to think clearly or sit upright for long.
Please use some patience. I think Dr. Bob has said that if you haven't heard a reply in a couple of days to send a reminder, and that's likely a good idea since sometimes there is so much mail that things get quickly lost.
I have proposed to Dr. Bob that new notifications go into a checklist where they can be checked off as dealt with.
Posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:44:07
In reply to Re: Please notify the administrators, posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:30:17
Posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:45:48
In reply to Re: Please notify the administrators » fayeroe, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:42:33
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:46:21
In reply to where did 'for the record fayeroe go? #762841 (nm), posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:44:07
I deleted it and reposted it without your posting name, since I hadn't intended to direct it to you. It was on a different thread.
Posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:52:42
In reply to Re: where did 'for the record fayeroe go? #762841 » fayeroe, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:46:21
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 8:55:46
In reply to thank you, Dinah (nm), posted by fayeroe on June 13, 2007, at 8:52:42
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:11:07
In reply to So who is the F*ck You Fairy asper GG ?, posted by Happyflower on June 12, 2007, at 15:16:48
As an explanation about something that seems to be upsetting many people.
Often things are posted that can be interpreted in many ways. The writing board is particularly vulnerable in this area, and I suspect it's why great literature is considered great although I have never really understood great literature so I don't know if that's correct or just a projection based on my own confusion.
On occasion posts are brought to my attention that when explained as reported appear to be uncivil. But as I read the responses it is clear that others have interpreted the post differently.
I will not claim to be able to read gg's mind, but to me it is entirely reasonable to assume that she was talking about the internal voice that often follows us around to comment on what we've done in a critical way.
Does that mean that incivility can sometimes slip through in obscure posts or ambiguous posts (not speaking to this post or any post in particular)? Certainly it can. I know I often feel like posts I don't understand at all are in violation of the civility guidelines. But if I don't understand them well enough, I can't in all due conscience do anything about them, unless they are in violation of some other aspect of the civility guidelines. But the alternative, a draconian crackdown on anything that might be uncivil, does not appeal to me. If it appeals to others, they are free to suggest rule changes to Dr. Bob, without naming specific posts as examples.
I'll look at the thread again to see if anything was less open to different interpretations than the original post. If you wish to suggest posts to look at, please do so by using the reporting function rather than mentioning them on board.
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:13:42
In reply to Fairies and writing boards, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:11:07
I should, I suppose, add that context is important. A post in reply to another post gives context to the reply so there is less ambiguity involved.
Posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 9:14:27
In reply to Fairies and writing boards, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:11:07
Referring someone (whoever that someone is) in *chat* is not an abstract - it is concrete and it is a poster who posts on babble. All this talk of abstraction, projection and assumption is moot when you refer to someone in chat because it refers to someone here. End of story.
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:21:49
In reply to Re: Fairies and writing boards - the concrete, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 9:14:27
to report any specifics.
Posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 10:00:56
In reply to Please use the report this post button » dispatcher, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:21:49
I'm sorry, but this all very confusing - someone can refer to a post to say that it's projection or assumption but it's not OK to point to the specific cases, showing that it's not assumption or projection.
It doesn't seem right that one can discuss (or defend) one and not the other.
Maybe it's something I'm not seeing - but it reminds me of the big pink elephant in the middle of the room, but one is not allowed to name it.
Why use the notification button in this case? Especially when the post in question discusses a babble poster, from a deputy or former deputy? This silence does not sit right with me, especially since it is not being addressed or discussed - while other issues, like "offensive" language are brought to task relatively quickly.
Please explain this, as I said, I do not understand. & I was only replying to posts which referred to this as creative writing *abstractions* - which they are most certainly not.
Posted by AuntieMel on June 13, 2007, at 10:01:13
In reply to Please use the report this post button » dispatcher, posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 9:21:49
For anyone who is interested, that poem was written in April.
GG and I were having a tiff back then. It has since been ironed out.
Did anyone notice that the "I think it worked!" post was also in April - around the time I took a break?
Thank you, gg, for not telling on me.
Posted by Dinah on June 13, 2007, at 10:08:08
In reply to Re: Please use the report this post button » Dinah, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 10:00:56
I asked in a previous post, and I was repeating it again, for anyone who wanted to point out specifics from posts in that thread to use the report this post function rather than discuss it on board.
I've said this several times now, and I'm afraid I'm going to have to enforce the request if there are any further discussions of the potential incivility of a specific post, or phrases from a post, or about a poster.
Posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 10:24:48
In reply to Re: Please use the report this post button » Dinah, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 10:00:56
> Especially when the post in question discusses a babble poster, from a deputy or former deputy?
Please do not jump to conclusions about my creative writing. I'm feeling increasingly resentful when reading what my poem supposedly is about given that the authors of those messages could have no way of knowing this, unless there is some new technology out there for getting inside someone's brain and interpreting the electrical activity from afar.
> This silence does not sit right with me, especially since it is not being addressed or discussed - while other issues, like "offensive" language are brought to task relatively quickly.
Offensive language issues are easy to address. For issues that deputies choose to defer to or consult with Dr. Bob, it's not so simple. Given Dr. Bob's availability recently, I think the Man in Black said it best, "Get used to disappointment."
>
> Please explain this, as I said, I do not understand. & I was only replying to posts which referred to this as creative writing *abstractions* - which they are most certainly not.I refer you to the first sentence in my message. It applies here as well.
Thanks,
gg
Posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 10:37:36
In reply to assumptions and patience » dispatcher, posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 10:24:48
I wasn't necessarily talking about your post -
Posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 10:38:13
In reply to Re: Thanks for not telling, GG, posted by AuntieMel on June 13, 2007, at 10:01:13
...given how far you had to travel to follow me around. ;)
gg
Posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 11:39:53
In reply to assumptions and patience » dispatcher, posted by gardenergirl on June 13, 2007, at 10:24:48
Namaste, gg, namaste -
I'm sorry if you are feeling increasingly resentful. But as you (& Racer) have said before -no one can make you feel anything. I hope you are not accusing me of reading your mind & therefor feeling resentful b/c of it, because I can assure you - I cannot read minds.
But, hopefully to make you feel better - & as a special treat I quoted the Satya for you - the second yama of ashtanga yoga.
>"Satya is truthfulness. It is more than just telling the truth. One's actions should be in accordance with one's words and thoughts. God and man's true Self are truth, and in order to tune in with that consciousness we need to live truthfully at all times. Furthermore lying creates many thoughts in the mind which go against the raja yoga objective of calming the mind.
Depending on one's inclination, there can be different conceptions of the truth. A moralist cares for the results of the truth so that if a lie must be told in order to bring about the greatest good for the greatest number of people, then this can only be the truth. It is easy to fall into this pitfall thinking that you are helping many people when in fact you may be arranging circumstances to benefit only yourself. One must be always watching the mind to be sure where one's true motive's lie.
The conception of truth for a spiritual man is that Brahman is the only absolute truth and everything else is ultimately an untruth. Many uncompassionate people can use this idea as a way to justify their actions when in fact they are really hurting a number of people with their untruths.
In this modern age, it is commonly accepted for people to commit to various things and to have no intention of keeping their word, the feeling being it is more important to tell someone what they think they want to hear rather than simply telling the truth. Swami Sivananda instructs us that it would be better to say something like, "I'll try, let me think it over," so that you don't make commitments you can't keep.
While telling the truth it is important to speak in a positive way so as not to cause hurt, yet at the same time be as straightforward and sincere as possible. To many people it might seem impractical or too difficult to always be truthful, but if practiced over time it becomes easier and many stumbling blocks along the path are removed.
"Truth is righteousness. Righteousness is light, and light is bliss. Ahimsa, Brahmacharya, purity, justice, harmony, forgiveness, peace are forms of truth... Truth stands even when there is no public support.
Swami Sivananda, Bliss Divine"
Posted by Happyflower on June 13, 2007, at 12:06:27
In reply to oh I forgot - » gardenergirl, posted by dispatcher on June 13, 2007, at 11:39:53
Wow, I wish I could have said that! That is what I was thinking mostly. I think I will frame that and hang it by my computer. ;-) I think a lot of babblers understand what you are saying, dispatcher, and thank you from me. But like everything else around here, NOTHING will change when the power is out of our hands. I may not have any power at Babble, but my personal power and truth will always lead me the right way. It has all my life, I have risen above a lot in my life, and I know in my heart the truth.
Satya!
Happyflower
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.