![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 1 to 23 of 23. This is the beginning of the thread.
Posted by Dr. Bob on July 2, 2008, at 3:00:44
In reply to Lou's request to Mr. Hsiung-hpcr224u » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou PIlder on June 25, 2008, at 8:36:54
> I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
Bob
Posted by Phillipa on July 2, 2008, at 18:39:37
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on July 2, 2008, at 3:00:44
Dr. Bob may I ask a question? If you no longer have time to answer e-mails and Deputies can't who answers them anyone? Just a question. Thanks Phillipa
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:06:10
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on July 2, 2008, at 3:00:44
> > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
>
> If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
>
> I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
>
> BobFriends,
If you are a discussant, or if you are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am asking that you read the offered link with all the posts in that thread (citation grsdlbindf?)), for the link is to the post that Mr. Hsiung took the statement out of that his reply to me to innitiate this thread comes from.
Lou
(citation grsdlbindf?)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2080424/msgs/836357.html
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:10:41
In reply to Lou's request to discussants- » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:06:10
> > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> >
> > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> >
> > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Friends,
> If you are a discussant, or if you are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am asking that you read the offered link with all the posts in that thread (citation grsdlbindf?)), for the link is to the post that Mr. Hsiung took the statement out of that his reply to me to innitiate this thread comes from.
> Lou
> (citation grsdlbindf?)
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2080424/msgs/836357.htmlFriends,
The corrected link is:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2080424/msgs/836357.html
Lou
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:20:29
In reply to Lou's request to discussants-corrected link, posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:10:41
> > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > >
> > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > >
> > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> > Friends,
> > If you are a discussant, or if you are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am asking that you read the offered link with all the posts in that thread (citation grsdlbindf?)), for the link is to the post that Mr. Hsiung took the statement out of that his reply to me to innitiate this thread comes from.
> > Lou
> > (citation grsdlbindf?)
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2080424/msgs/836357.html
>
> Friends,
> The corrected link is:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/2080424/msgs/836357.html
> Lou
>Friends,
The corrected link:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs//836357.html
Lou
Posted by Phillipa on July 5, 2008, at 17:18:36
In reply to Lou's request to discussants-corrected link, posted by Lou PIlder on July 2, 2008, at 22:20:29
I'm hoping that you will get responses to your e-mails soon. Don't know content but must be frustrating to you. Phillipa
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 5:23:15
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Dr. Bob on July 2, 2008, at 3:00:44
> > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
>
> If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
>
> I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
>
> BobRobert,
You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
(citations dscrm66 and 67)
H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
Lou Pilder
(citation dlibindf-asem49)
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
(citations dscrm66 and 67
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 9:08:23
In reply to Lou's reply to Robert Hsiung-bstntehprty » Dr. Bob, posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 5:23:15
> > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> >
> > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> >
> > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> >
> > Bob
>
> Robert,
> You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> Lou Pilder
> (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> (citations dscrm66 and 67
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> Lou PilderFriends,
If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
there is an underscore between my name and 1188
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 9:12:15
In reply to Lou's request to discussants-rvelvdahantsem, posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 9:08:23
> > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > >
> > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > >
> > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> > Robert,
> > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > Lou Pilder
> > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Friends,
> If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> Lou
> lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> there is an underscore between my name and 1188Friends,
The corrected link is:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
Lou
Posted by Dena on July 7, 2008, at 1:28:38
In reply to Re: Lou's request » Dr. Bob, posted by Phillipa on July 2, 2008, at 18:39:37
> Dr. Bob may I ask a question? If you no longer have time to answer e-mails and Deputies can't who answers them anyone? Just a question. Thanks Phillipa
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I've got to agree with Phillipa that this is a frustrating set-up.
How long does Lou have to wait before receiving a response?
It's interesting to me that the reason for posting-guidelines is to provide an atmosphere of support for people ... but it strikes me that Lou isn't very supported.
Why the discrepancy?
It reminds me a bit of "Animal Farm"... all people are equal, but some are more equal than others.
Disturbing.
I'm hoping it's an oversight, and an honest mistake -- otherwise, it appears to be more akin to discrimination.
I'd really like to give the benefit of the doubt about that, but it does cross my mind...
Shalom, Dena
Posted by Sigismund on July 11, 2008, at 15:36:11
In reply to Re: Lou's request » Phillipa, posted by Dena on July 7, 2008, at 1:28:38
I don't understand any of this.
Is Lou entitled to a response or not?
Posted by Lou PIlder on July 15, 2008, at 4:12:12
In reply to Re: Lou's request, posted by Sigismund on July 11, 2008, at 15:36:11
> I don't understand any of this.
>
> Is Lou entitled to a response or not?Sigismund,
You wrote,[...don't understand...entitled to...?].
There is much more to this that I think could come into focus if other aspects of this situation here are brought out. In the following link that I am asking for members here interested in this discussion to click on, the concept of the notification system here that the deputies and Mr. Hsiung receive the notification is brought out. There is a confirmation that a member receives after they send a notifiacation. .
For a notification to be {missed}, one could have many things brought into mind with that language used for {missed} could be thought of in many ways. And if something is {missed] and Mr. Hsiung writes that {we've} missed it, then I do not have the infomation for me to know what Mr. Hsiung's statement means untill I have an understanding as to what {missed } means by him.
Here is the link to a previous situation .
Lou
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/736368.html
Posted by Sigismund on July 16, 2008, at 5:38:03
In reply to Lou's response to Sigismund-dehsehp? » Sigismund, posted by Lou PIlder on July 15, 2008, at 4:12:12
Hey Lou
I doubt that anyone will tell me whether you are entitled to a response, and it seems even more unlikely (to me) that anyone will tell you.
Bob once said....
"My philosophy is not to wait until there's a forest fire:
http://www.smokeybear.com/vault/history.asp"
(http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040112/msgs/307041.html).....and there were a few forest fires, and now it looks like no fire will start at all, but still.....
I think you are entitled to a clear answer, one way or the other.
Posted by Dena on July 16, 2008, at 23:34:00
In reply to Smokey Bear » Lou PIlder, posted by Sigismund on July 16, 2008, at 5:38:03
> Hey Lou
>
> I doubt that anyone will tell me whether you are entitled to a response, and it seems even more unlikely (to me) that anyone will tell you.
>
> Bob once said....
> "My philosophy is not to wait until there's a forest fire:
> http://www.smokeybear.com/vault/history.asp"
> (http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040112/msgs/307041.html)
>
> .....and there were a few forest fires, and now it looks like no fire will start at all, but still.....
>
> I think you are entitled to a clear answer, one way or the other.
>
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree, Sigismund.
I simply do not understand why this situation has been ignored for so long. In my mind, it fosters an unsafe atmosphere in which to form a community based on good mental health.
It feels arbitrary, even discriminating.
I don't know which is worse -- that the leaders here do not care, are too busy, or are intentionally ignoring the situation.
I'm so sorry, Lou!
Shalom, Dena
"The unanswered questions aren't nearly as dangerous as the
unquestioned answers.""We turn to God for help when our foundations are shaking only to
learn that it is God shaking them." - Charles West"Naked is having no clothes on. Nekkid is having no clothes on and
being up to something.""Our truth, when it becomes the ONLY truth, ceases to be truth."
"While we're not fearful of tasting new things, we don't necessarily
swallow all that we taste."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Posted by SLS on July 17, 2008, at 5:42:08
In reply to Re: Smokey Bear » Sigismund, posted by Dena on July 16, 2008, at 23:34:00
I believe this was the first page for which unlimited posting became a problem. Of course, to call it a problem is really my problem, but...
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040902/
- Scott
Posted by Sigismund on July 17, 2008, at 15:53:39
In reply to Re: Smokey Bear, posted by SLS on July 17, 2008, at 5:42:08
How pleasant it was to read some old posts by badhaircut.
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 3, 2008, at 11:05:10
In reply to correction to link, posted by Lou PIlder on July 6, 2008, at 9:12:15
> > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > >
> > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > >
> > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > >
> > > > Bob
> > >
> > > Robert,
> > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > Lou Pilder
> > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Friends,
> > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > Lou
> > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
>
> Friends,
> The corrected link is:
> http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> LouMr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2008, at 7:27:10
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung-lstthrmhitns, posted by Lou Pilder on August 3, 2008, at 11:05:10
> > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > >
> > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bob
> > > >
> > > > Robert,
> > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > Lou
> > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> >
> > Friends,
> > The corrected link is:
> > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > Lou
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
Lou Pilder
Posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2008, at 7:25:32
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung- » Lou Pilder, posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2008, at 7:27:10
> > > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bob
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert,
> > > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > Lou
> > > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > The corrected link is:
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > Lou
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> Lou PilderMr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
Friends,
If you are considering responding to this thread or parallel threads, I am requesting that you click on the links in the thread and read the posts involved that are connected to the issues involved. This could be more time than you have to do that so if you would like for me to show you directly the issues involved,and why I thoink that they are important, you could email me if you like
I am asking for you to do this now because of what I consider to be the issues involved in the world conditions now that may be unbeknownst to you. If you would like to discuss that by email, I could show this in more detail.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
there is an underscore between my name and the 1188
Posted by Geegee on October 11, 2008, at 22:54:08
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung/request to members, posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2008, at 7:25:32
In reply to Lou's reminder to [Dr.] Hsiung- » Lou Pilder, posted by Lou Pilder on August 13, 2008, at 7:27:10
> > > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bob
> > > > >
> > > > > [Bob],
> > > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > > A. The generally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies refer to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them initially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifications was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies refers to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted meaning of [significant} is that the significant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddressed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that your TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifications. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > > You have posted here to me,[...Im no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > If you are a discussant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offered link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > > If you would like more information concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical parallels to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the Merriam Webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > Lou
> > > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> > >
> > > Friends,
> > > The corrected link is:
> > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > Lou
> >
> > [Dr.] Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> [Dr.] Hsiung,
> In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> Lou Pilder
[Dr.] Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
Friends,
If you are considering responding to this thread or parallel threads, I am requesting that you click on the links in the thread and read the posts involved that are connected to the issues involved. This could be more time than you have to do that so if you would like for me to show you directly the issues involved, and why I think that they are important, you could email me if you like
I am asking for you to do this now because of what I consider to be the issues involved in the world conditions now that may be unbeknownst to you. If you would like to discuss that by email, I could show this in more detail.
Lou
lpilder_1188@fuse.net
there is an underscore between my name and the 1188
Posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2011, at 12:37:25
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung/request to members, posted by Lou Pilder on October 11, 2008, at 7:25:32
> > > > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bob
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Robert,
> > > > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > >
> > > > > Friends,
> > > > > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > > > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > > Lou
> > > > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> > > >
> > > > Friends,
> > > > The corrected link is:
> > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > Lou
> > >
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > Lou Pilder
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> Friends,
> If you are considering responding to this thread or parallel threads, I am requesting that you click on the links in the thread and read the posts involved that are connected to the issues involved. This could be more time than you have to do that so if you would like for me to show you directly the issues involved,and why I thoink that they are important, you could email me if you like
> I am asking for you to do this now because of what I consider to be the issues involved in the world conditions now that may be unbeknownst to you. If you would like to discuss that by email, I could show this in more detail.
> Lou
> lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> there is an underscore between my name and the 1188
>
> Mr. Hsiung,
In accordance with your reminder provision, the above
Lou PIlder
>
>
Posted by Lou Pilder on February 12, 2013, at 15:36:56
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung/request to members, posted by Lou Pilder on November 12, 2011, at 12:37:25
> > > > > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bob
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Robert,
> > > > > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > > > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > > > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > > > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > > > > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > > > Lou
> > > > > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > > > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> > > > >
> > > > > Friends,
> > > > > The corrected link is:
> > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > > Lou
> > > >
> > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > >
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > > Lou Pilder
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > Friends,
> > If you are considering responding to this thread or parallel threads, I am requesting that you click on the links in the thread and read the posts involved that are connected to the issues involved. This could be more time than you have to do that so if you would like for me to show you directly the issues involved,and why I thoink that they are important, you could email me if you like
> > I am asking for you to do this now because of what I consider to be the issues involved in the world conditions now that may be unbeknownst to you. If you would like to discuss that by email, I could show this in more detail.
> > Lou
> > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > there is an underscore between my name and the 1188
> >
> > Mr. Hsiung,
> In accordance with your reminder provision, the above
> Lou PIlder
> >
> > Mr Hsiung,
In regards to your reminder policy, the above.
Lou Pilder
>
>
Posted by Lou Pilder on May 11, 2013, at 14:23:18
In reply to Lou's reminder to Mr. Hsiung/request to members-B, posted by Lou Pilder on February 12, 2013, at 15:36:56
> > > > > > > > > > I am unsure as to why then some notifications of mine are outstanding and also some emails from me to you are outstanding.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them, sorry. Please notify us again.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I know there are emails outstanding, and I'm sorry about that, too, but I'm no longer able to answer all my email.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Bob
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Robert,
> > > > > > > > You wrote,[...If there are notifications outstanding, we've missed them,sorry. Please notify us again...] and, [...I'm no longer able to answer all my email...].
> > > > > > > > In your citation of what I wrote, it comes from a post that is about my request to you for a clearer understanding about your rationales, your policy, and your TOS in that you welcome feedback and that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and that you want members to trust you on that and that you take responsibility for what you post here..
> > > > > > > > In particular, but not limited to that I had requested for you to post here your criteria that you use to determine if or if not a statement could or could not lead one to feel accused or put down.(citation dlbindif-asem49) In your post that I responded to, you wrote that,[...I'd like..posters..to notify us..That way,..we'll be ready...].
> > > > > > > > Your reply to me that you have missed any notifications that are outstanding and that I could send them again to you brings up to me the following want for clarification. If you could clarify the following, then I could have the opportunity to respond accordingly.
> > > > > > > > A. The genearally accepted meanings of {missed} are various. Could you specify which of the meanings of {missed} you are wanting to mean in your statement to me?
> > > > > > > > B. If you are keeping a count on me and others that send notifications as per your 3 request rule for posts by a particular member, then could not you and/or your deputies referr to that list, if there is one, to find any outstanding notifications? If not, could you post here why not? If there is no list, could you tell here how your rule is kept a record of the number of requests?
> > > > > > > > C. If what you are wanting to mean here by {we've missed them} is that they were all deleted by all the deputies and yourself, since a confirmation is given to that the notification has been sent, could there be a way for you and or your deputies to contact Matt's script to have a record of the notifications?
> > > > > > > > D. Has there not been posts by the administration here saying that notifications are discussed by the deputies? If so, if all the outstanding notifications of mine have been deleted by all the deputies and yourself, could there be some of the discussion remaining so that if you make a call to your deputies that they may find some record of the notifications?
> > > > > > > > E. If all of the outstanding notifications have been deleted by you and all your deputies, if they have been deleted, could not that the time of the notification by me being known as to the reminders posted here by me for you and/or your deputies to respond in relation to your TOS to the outstanding notifications be some way for you and/or your deputies to examine posts before that time on your own that could be related to my notifications if you and/or your deputies at least read them innitially as the confirmation page says that they were sent? One of your deputies does write here that at least one of the notifiactions was seen and also that the deputy remembers it to be a notification from a post on the faith board
> > > > > > > > F. Your reply to me here comes after what one of your deputies referrs to as {significant time} has elapsed after reminders are posted here concerning outstanding notifications. The generally accepted mesaning of [significant} is that the siginificant time lapse between the notification and your addressing of the post in question could have {influence} of cause {an effect}. Since there were reminders of even the reminders, could not that the post in question is at this time still unaddressed cause an effect or influence here? If so, and your TOS states that you do what in your thinking will be good for the community as a whole and to trust you about that, my reminder is to how could in your thinking leaving the notification unaddresed for a significant time be good for the community as a whole?
> > > > > > > > G. You are requesting that I send them to you again. Do you not remember that I have written here that I consider to re send a notification to be an additional term or condition to me here as a member and I will not submit to any additional terms or conditions and that yout TOS states that notifications will either be replied to on the thread where the post in question is or that a babblemail or email will be sent to the member that sent the notification and that you take responsibility for what you write? If you remember me posting that here to you before, why are you asking me again here to resend a notification?
> > > > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67)
> > > > > > > > H. Have you not read here where I posted that I would be glad to re send the notification if:
> > > > > > > > You and each of your deputies post here, individually, that you do not have the notifications and why you do not have them, and also now to include that you do not have a record of any discussion about them and that you will not take the time to look at the dates of the reminders and look at posts from that time and also that you have no memory of them. If each of your deputies and yourself could post such, then I will re send the notifisctions. Members here interested in those outstanding notifications could email if they like and make their own determination as to this situation.
> > > > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > > > > (citation dlibindf-asem49)
> > > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20080424/msgs/836357.html
> > > > > > > > (citations dscrm66 and 67
> > > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20061018/msgs/699224.html
> > > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/727348.html
> > > > > > > > You have posted here to me,[...i'm no longer able to answer all my email...]
> > > > > > > > The generally accepted meaning of {all} could be {every}. So as I read the grammatical structure of your statement here, it means to me that you could theoretically answer 999 emails out of 1000 emails to you. If there is some other way you want your statement to mean here, could you post that here?
> > > > > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > > If you are a discusant or are considering to be a discussant in this thread, I am requesting that you click on the offerd link here to the first post of a thread where this has been discussed previously and look at the other posts in the thread. If you could, then I think that you could have a better understanding of the issues involved in this thread and be better able to respond accordingly if you are going to post in this thread.
> > > > > > > There may be related issues in other threads that may be unbeknownst to you that involve that notifications of mine, as seen as reminders here, have a significant time lag from the confirmation of the sending of the notification and any response from the administration.
> > > > > > > If you would like more infomation concerning this, you could email me if you like because there have been rules made here, and some are not in the FAQ, that I am unsure of as to how those rules are going to be applied in relation to posting links to historical paralles to the situation that exists here in relation to the notifications of mine being {missed}. I invite you to use the merriam-webster search for {missed},and if you are going to email me, please include a statement that you are over 21 years of age. The link that I would like for you to click on and look at the other posts in that thread is:
> > > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babbbe/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > > > > Lou
> > > > > > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > > > > > there is an underscore between my name and 1188
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Friends,
> > > > > > The corrected link is:
> > > > > > http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20070123/msgs/726277.html
> > > > > > Lou
> > > > >
> > > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you of outstanding requests, the above.
> > > > > Lou Pilder
> > > >
> > > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > > In accordance with your procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > > > Lou Pilder
> > >
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > > In accordance with your reminder procedure to keep reminding you, the above.
> > > Friends,
> > > If you are considering responding to this thread or parallel threads, I am requesting that you click on the links in the thread and read the posts involved that are connected to the issues involved. This could be more time than you have to do that so if you would like for me to show you directly the issues involved,and why I thoink that they are important, you could email me if you like
> > > I am asking for you to do this now because of what I consider to be the issues involved in the world conditions now that may be unbeknownst to you. If you would like to discuss that by email, I could show this in more detail.
> > > Lou
> > > lpilder_1188@fuse.net
> > > there is an underscore between my name and the 1188
> > >
> > > Mr. Hsiung,
> > In accordance with your reminder provision, the above
> > Lou PIlder
> > >
> > > Mr Hsiung,
> In regards to your reminder policy, the above.
> Lou Pilder
> >
> >
> Mr Hsiung,' In regards to your policy to keep reminding you, the above requests from me to you are outstanding.
Lou Pilder
>
This is the end of the thread.
Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.