Psycho-Babble Administration Thread 957932

Shown: posts 1 to 20 of 20. This is the beginning of the thread.

 

THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM

Posted by manic666 on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:18

Im sorry but i carnt say sorry to people for thing,s i wrote . If true why say sorry that make,s me a liar. There is only one boss in my house an her name is ruth the wife?? Nothing has been gained by the thread about babble . Only a couple more blocks ,people told to behave as if they were childred an more babblers fleeing the forum.One poster dominates every thread with rubbish, an the newbies fall in the trap.They soon discover there mistake an leave. Nothing will change an every one will get there tread hijacked by the same person thus killing there thread dead. I raise a glass to the banned an blocked babblers an sign out of what once cool forum. MANIC 666

 

Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM

Posted by morgan miller on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:18

In reply to THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM, posted by manic666 on August 6, 2010, at 14:05:20

It would help to know what that one person is you are referring to.

Are you saying you are leaving for good?

 

Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM » morgan miller

Posted by 10derHeart on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:18

In reply to Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM, posted by morgan miller on August 6, 2010, at 16:03:40

> It would help to know what that one person is you are referring to.

Well, it might *help* (not quite sure how) but it would definitely be uncivil to state a name. In fact, manic is likely already there with the rubbish remark, and and i expect he knows that from past experience.....and he knows, too, what he can/cannot do now. We all make choices.

> Are you saying you are leaving for good?

I hope he does not. Manic is a smart cookie (we *old* people kinda know a couple of things....sometimes) makes people laugh, and is good for this place.

Why don't you try to stay, manic?

 

Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM

Posted by Justherself54 on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:18

In reply to Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM » morgan miller, posted by 10derHeart on August 7, 2010, at 0:53:09

I want him to stay too!!

 

Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM

Posted by chujoe on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:19

In reply to Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM, posted by Justherself54 on August 7, 2010, at 1:14:35

I'm relatively new here, but Manic is one of the folks who makes this place interesting & useful. I hope to see Manic around here for a long time.

 

Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM

Posted by Willful on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:19

In reply to THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM, posted by manic666 on August 6, 2010, at 14:05:20

I'm sorry you've left. I've always enjoyed your posts-- at least a lot of them-- and I hope you come back.

Willful

 

fyi - 11 week block on admin (nm)

Posted by BayLeaf on August 8, 2010, at 20:19:03

In reply to Re: THE LUNATIC HAS LEFT THE ASYLUM, posted by Willful on August 8, 2010, at 19:55:19

 

Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin » BayLeaf

Posted by morgan miller on August 8, 2010, at 21:35:12

In reply to fyi - 11 week block on admin (nm), posted by BayLeaf on August 8, 2010, at 20:19:03

What does that mean on Admin? An admin chose to block for 11 weeks? This one is just plain weird.

Was it the use of the word "asylum" that someone took a wee bit too personally?

I don't get it, I would like a full explanation for the 11 week block. It's almost laughable.

Morgan

 

Re: fyi - 11 week block on meds board. » morgan miller

Posted by BayLeaf on August 8, 2010, at 23:21:56

In reply to Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin » BayLeaf, posted by morgan miller on August 8, 2010, at 21:35:12

morgan, the word "admin" was actually a typo. sorry for the additional confusion. i see you found it there.

 

Re: blocked for 11 weeks » Dr. Bob

Posted by morgan miller on August 9, 2010, at 1:33:27

In reply to Re: blocked for 11 weeks » manic666, posted by Dr. Bob on August 8, 2010, at 20:02:28

Really??? 11 weeks???

Wow, that's a bit extreme isn't it?

Is this a typo? Should it really be one week?

 

Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin

Posted by sigismund on August 9, 2010, at 3:31:03

In reply to fyi - 11 week block on admin (nm), posted by BayLeaf on August 8, 2010, at 20:19:03

Presumably manic?

Where on Admin?

 

Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin

Posted by chujoe on August 9, 2010, at 6:14:34

In reply to Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin, posted by sigismund on August 9, 2010, at 3:31:03

Manic was banned for 11 weeks for saying that one person dominates every thread with rubbish. This was, I presume, in response to Lou P's cut & paste, non-responsive, anti-community posts. In this most recent case, I posted a question about Cymbalta & almost immediately Lou started another thread with "Cymbalta" in the title, but that pointed to a video about the dangers of Seroquel. (In other words, "rubbish.") That struck me as abusive, but I let it slide because, well, it was Lou. My original post got two responses while Lou's got, I dunno, fifty or something. Lou has a right to his views, as I have said many times, but that shouldn't mean that others have to accept what are in effect lies about psych drugs from him. So we're stuck in a situation where Lou can post rubbish and be completely non-responsive without any administrative sanction, but Manic can get an 11 week block for saying something is rubbish -- not the person, mind you, but the information.

So I'll be clearing out of Kafka's kindergarten.

 

Re: blocked for week » chujoe

Posted by Dr. Bob on August 9, 2010, at 16:01:24

In reply to Re: fyi - 11 week block on admin, posted by chujoe on August 9, 2010, at 6:14:34

> Lou started another thread with "Cymbalta" in the title, but that pointed to a video about the dangers of Seroquel. (In other words, "rubbish.") That struck me as abusive

Please don't post anything that could lead others to feel accused or put down.

But please don't take this personally, either, this doesn't mean I don't like you or think you're a bad person, and I'm sorry if this hurts you.

> I let it slide because, well, it was Lou. ... Lou has a right to his views, as I have said many times, but that shouldn't mean that others have to accept what are in effect lies about psych drugs from him. So we're stuck in a situation where Lou can post rubbish and be completely non-responsive without any administrative sanction, but Manic can get an 11 week block for saying something is rubbish -- not the person, mind you, but the information.

I wish you could've continued to let it slide. No one has to accept what anyone else says. Don't necessarily believe everything you hear. If you disagree with someone else's point of view, you're free to post your own. Different points of view are fine, and in fact encouraged.

I do hope that you choose to remain a member of this community and that members of this community help you, if needed, to avoid future blocks.

It's up to you to decide whom you interact with. Sometimes interacting with others may be frustrating, staying civil may be a challenge, and new skills may help. If you're open to developing new skills (which I realize may not be why you came in the first place), that's another way in which you may be supported by other posters.

More information about posting policies and tips on alternative ways to express yourself, including a link to a nice post by Dinah on I-statements, are in the FAQ:

http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#enforce

Lou, I'm also sorry if you felt hurt.

Follow-ups regarding these issues, as well as replies to the above post, should of course themselves be civil.

Thanks,

Bob

 

Another one bites the dust... (nm)

Posted by violette on August 9, 2010, at 17:04:10

In reply to Re: blocked for week » chujoe, posted by Dr. Bob on August 9, 2010, at 16:01:24

 

Re: Another one bites the dust... » violette

Posted by morgan miller on August 9, 2010, at 22:28:12

In reply to Another one bites the dust... (nm), posted by violette on August 9, 2010, at 17:04:10

Are you ready? Are you ready for this? Are you hangin on the edge of your seat?
Out of the doorway the bullets rip, to the sound of the beat. Waaaoooh!!
Boump boump boump..Another one bites the dust-a!
Budda Boump boump boump..Another on bites the dust-a!
And another one down and another down and another one bites the dust.
Hey! Gonna get you to
Another on bites the dust!

Sorry, had to make light of the situation.

 

Didn't want to upset Lou

Posted by ed_uk2010 on August 12, 2010, at 14:45:35

In reply to Re: Another one bites the dust... » violette, posted by morgan miller on August 9, 2010, at 22:28:12

Manic has emailed me to say he is worried that Lou might feel he was talking about him. Manic says that he wants Lou to know that he wasn't talking about it, and that he didn't want to hurt Lou's feelings.

 

Re: Didn't want to upset Lou

Posted by polarbear206 on August 12, 2010, at 20:08:03

In reply to Didn't want to upset Lou, posted by ed_uk2010 on August 12, 2010, at 14:45:35

> Manic has emailed me to say he is worried that Lou might feel he was talking about him. Manic says that he wants Lou to know that he wasn't talking about it, and that he didn't want to hurt Lou's feelings.
>
>

Manic, I'm one who knew it wasn't Lou you were refering to if it helps to make you feel better. :)

 

Re: Didn't want to upset Lou » ed_uk2010

Posted by violette on August 13, 2010, at 8:44:19

In reply to Didn't want to upset Lou, posted by ed_uk2010 on August 12, 2010, at 14:45:35

Manic-that was very considerate of you..and you too, Ed, for conveying the message.

Manic-I didn't see any indications that you were talking about anyone in particular-Mostly I think you're a witty person who speaks from the heart. And you help liven up this place.

 

Re: Didn't want to upset Lou » violette

Posted by Maxime on October 17, 2010, at 20:50:25

In reply to Re: Didn't want to upset Lou » ed_uk2010, posted by violette on August 13, 2010, at 8:44:19

This all makes me feel like I am back in high school where would pass notes and ask others to see if others were interested in us.Oy.

 

Isn't it another TWO bites the dust???

Posted by muffled on November 7, 2010, at 22:34:31

In reply to Re: Didn't want to upset Lou » violette, posted by Maxime on October 17, 2010, at 20:50:25

Manic and chujoe?


This is the end of the thread.


Show another thread

URL of post in thread:


Psycho-Babble Administration | Extras | FAQ


[dr. bob] Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD, bob@dr-bob.org

Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.