Re: on Ellis » Declan

Posted by Jost on July 16, 2006, at 20:22:15

In reply to Re: on Ellis, posted by Declan on July 15, 2006, at 22:10:15

Imho, Nabokov (I can't speak to Edmund White) had a *way* too refined sensibility.
Plus whether it works or not, psychoanalysis has changed vastly sinced Nabokov formed his opinion of it. Vulgar? no, I don't think so, although perhaps as practiced, or theorized, in the 1950's and 1960's, it was.
Jost.

Thread

Can't Get Over It cecilia 7/15/06
...
Re: Can't Get Over It » cecilia Jost 7/15/06
Re: on Ellis » Declan pseudoname 7/15/06
just to clarify re Burns pseudoname 7/15/06
mindfulness and MacGyver » mayzee pseudoname 7/15/06
Re: on Ellis » pseudoname Declan 7/15/06
Re: on Ellis Declan 7/15/06
Is psychoanalysis vulgar? » Declan pseudoname 7/16/06
Re: Is psychoanalysis vulgar? » pseudoname Declan 7/16/06
Re: Is psychoanalysis vulgar? Declan 7/16/06
Re: Is psychoanalysis vulgar? (nm) canadagirl 7/16/06
Re: Is psychoanalysis vulgar? Oops ignore the nm canadagirl 7/16/06
Thanks! and Hi! :-) (nm) » canadagirl pseudoname 7/16/06
Re: on Ellis » Declan Jost 7/16/06
Vulgarity » Jost Declan 7/16/06
Re: Vulgarity » Declan Jost 7/17/06
Re: Vulgarity llrrrpp 7/22/06

Post a new follow-up

Notify the administrators

Start a new thread

poster:Jost thread:667290
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/psycho/20060703/msgs/667590.html

	for
in