Posted by Gabbix2 on February 10, 2003, at 20:30:24
In reply to Re: please keep this thread civil (nm), posted by Dr. Bob on February 10, 2003, at 19:12:16
Okay, I didn't watch the Michael Jackson, whatever it was, interview, documentary.
I echo Tina's sentiments, but I'm hearing people talk about the children. Has he actually been charged with anything, or is this public censure a-la Lyndy Chamberlain 'A cry in the Dark'
I know he settled out of court for one case, which does not mean an admission of guilt.
I also know that children are often encouraged especially in high publicity cases, to say things that they wouldn't have thought of without suggestion bordering on coersion. McMartin Daycare travesty is a great example.Okay MJ had a birthmark the kid recognized.
Well good guess!!! he was 12 years old, look at Michael Jacksons Face, hands, what are the chances of a 12 year old guessing he has other marks. I've changed in front of kids before, very young kids,
I've also cuddled with them, is it different because I'm a woman?I'm not saying he's not 'guilty' how would I know? I'm just wondering what the reasons are he's being censured.
Cause he's weird? We're all weird. Weird people can make great parents.
If any of us had our private lives on display someone would find fault with it. God would they find fault with it! You don't even have to make it public all you have to do is forget to mow your lawn.So what is it besides public opinion, was there something definate pointed out in the interview?
BTW I'm a survivor of childhood sexual abuse, so I'm not blind, but if I were to judge one way or another I'd say its them "normal ones' (whatever that is) ones you have to watch out for.
poster:Gabbix2
thread:36527
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/social/20030208/msgs/36808.html