![[dr. bob]](/dr-bob-sm.gif)
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.orgShown: posts 12 to 36 of 73. Go back in thread:
Posted by spoc on April 26, 2004, at 21:55:35
In reply to Re: invisibility, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2004, at 20:57:24
> And that's where bulletin boards come in really handy. If you want to know what on earth flaming amygdalas or SPOW is, the search engine is a click away. And presto, you are "in" on the shared language and history. >
---
I've used that concept, and tried to join in speaking about the thing or giggling about it (whatever it is in a particular case), and people will still go around a person, clinking their glasses over their head.---
> Some people you might fall instantly in love with. Some people you might grow to appreciate over time.>---
That is of course true and natural and no disgrace. But this also may just not be a good medium for all, for reasons attributable only to themselves of course (like I go on too long in many cases as part of my issues; but I have posted much more brief stuff and things intended to benefit someone else). Because *if* it's harder here than it has been in someone's real life -- including in writing -- it might not be a good message for them to start getting about themself now. And some may do better if they fixed their problems first, but then they probably wouldn't need to be here period, so it's another paradox. Of course nothing can work for everyone, that's just the way it is. However, I am confident in saying that this could work for *more,* if people would be a bit more cognizant of some patterns that are easy to fall into.Please note that I definitely don't mean that people who click shouldn't flock together and enjoy it. I'm just saying, it is not unusual for people to talk around someone on a thread, even if that person speaks of the thing at hand, in context; and sometimes even if they try >> to get someone's attention. Just the facts ma'am! I know you are sincere and sincerely don't see the forest of which I speak through the trees. And I like and respect you, and don't want this all to bring you down! :- )
Posted by Dinah on April 26, 2004, at 22:17:57
In reply to Re: invisibility » Dinah, posted by spoc on April 26, 2004, at 21:55:35
You are right, of course. I don't really see it. And I suppose it wouldn't be considered civil to give concrete examples. But my email is in the FAQ's. If you'd like to email me with URL's and explanations, maybe I'd see the forest amongst the trees.
I care a lot about Babble, and if I'm missing something that I can help make better, I'd like to understand.
Posted by Dinah on April 26, 2004, at 22:21:55
In reply to Re: invisibility » Dinah, posted by spoc on April 26, 2004, at 21:55:35
While I truly meant what I said, I should warn that I am awful at email sometimes. The email screen isn't as user friendly to me as a posting screen and it takes more effort and concentration for some reason and is more daunting to me. So it takes me a bit longer to reply sometimes.
Posted by spoc on April 26, 2004, at 22:41:54
In reply to Re: invisibility » spoc, posted by Dinah on April 26, 2004, at 22:17:57
Posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 0:16:48
In reply to Re: Ok, I will email you this week : ) : ) (nm) » Dinah, posted by spoc on April 26, 2004, at 22:41:54
Spoc we TOTALLY agree...Dinah you know I adore you but we disagree here...yes I agree there are many reasons posters dont post to some posters or all posts..that applies to me too as summer comes I am seldom on and miss much BUT I do see cliques and have from the start...thats ok really but I feel bad for the ones who arent IN the crowd and seem to want to be. Me I love ya all :)
Posted by gardenergirl on April 27, 2004, at 1:11:37
In reply to I see it too spoc and dinah, posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 0:16:48
I'm jumping i a bit late here (actually really late as it is 2:00 a.m., sigh).
I have to admit, I don't really see it as Fallen4myT and spoc are describing. Perhaps this means that I am one of the offenders. I just know that, like Dinah, I don't always resond on every thread for a variety of reasons. Sometimes I don't have time. Sometimes I don't feel like I have anything to add. Sometimes, it's just not grabbing me, for whatever reason.
There are also times when I just don't understand a post, so I might not respond to it directly. I admit I don't always take the time to post questions to try to understand, as I already feel like my time online is rationed, and I hope that I will eventually figure it out or that it will get clarified by other posters. I guess that is a bit selfish of me.
I really wish that I could respond more to everything I read that is at all interesting. Sometimes I feel the need to "catch up" on responses, but then I am on for hours, and I really can't afford that right now, or I'll never graduate.
So, if I have inadvertently failed to respond to someone who posted to me or on a thread I started, I apologize. It's likely an oversight rather than an intentional slight. I seem to be developing that absent-minded professor shtick, :( If I tend to stick to only a few threads, unfortunately, that's all I can manage right now.
That all being said, I had the same feelings at the beginnning. I thought I was a thread killer and an outsider. But it changed the more I posted. It took a few months, I believe.
Glad all babblers are here. It's really a cool place filled with warm and wonderful, unique people.
gg
Posted by All Done on April 27, 2004, at 1:54:50
In reply to Invisibility, posted by gardenergirl on April 27, 2004, at 1:11:37
To all,
I'm kind of at a loss here. It makes me sad to know that you feel this way and I want to post to try to make you all feel less invisible, but I'm not exactly sure how to go about it. Part of me feels like I should apologize if I was one of the offenders (if so, I am truly sorry). The other part of me wants to give reasons why I don't always post (time is my major issue and when I do have time, I will admit, sometimes I post to those I've had previous interactions with first).
I realize there are plenty of reasons you feel this way but I also realize there are plenty of reasons you shouldn't feel this way (Dinah did a pretty good job with the latter). So, the best advice I can give is probably the hardest. Just keep jumping in where you can and eventually, I bet it won't feel the same anymore. I have found Babble to be a wonderful place to interact and make friends. Ironically, though, sometimes it is necessary to have thick skin while waiting for replies.
I hope you all know we all appreciate your presence here and no one wants you to feel like an outsider.
Take care,
All Done
Posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 7:10:06
In reply to Re: underthecs, Fallen4MyT, lonelygirl, and spoc, posted by All Done on April 27, 2004, at 1:54:50
And I don't even know you!
I definitely look at the thread subjects and read based on that. Some boards I don't even check due to my inability to contribute anything meangingful. I have to say that all the boards are interesting, but I can't relate to them all the time.
I figure when my thread is the last post, that the subject has been exhausted , or I jumped in too late (like here, perhaps??). I guess I wouldn't take it personally because PB is only a part of what makes me, me. We DON'T really know each other that well. I would be uncomfortable to think that someone had based an opinion of my values and judgement just on my posts here.
Also, when thread subjects are directed at a particular individual, I try to respect that.
:)
Posted by Dinah on April 27, 2004, at 7:55:18
In reply to Where is underthecs in all of this?, posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 7:10:06
> Also, when thread subjects are directed at a particular individual, I try to respect that.
Now, *that* I would tend to disagree with. I figure all threads are on an open board, and anyone can jump in anywhere. People can always make space for more input. I know sometimes I direct a post at a particular poster for a particular reason (See my post to Racer below), but that doesn't mean I don't welcome other input. I just want someone to see something, that's all.
Posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 8:08:15
In reply to Where is underthecs in all of this?, posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 7:10:06
Posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 9:03:55
In reply to Re: Where is underthecs in all of this?, posted by Dinah on April 27, 2004, at 7:55:18
Dinah, I'm just saying that is what I *personally* do. Don't mean to take a stance or anything.
Have you noticed that I am extremely non-confrontational? AKA a wimp?
rainyday
Posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 10:11:41
In reply to Invisibility, posted by gardenergirl on April 27, 2004, at 1:11:37
... when I have already spent too much time in one thread or archive, and want to skim all the current boards too before I attempt to shut the door, I will unconciously scroll down them and often not "see" a new thread that has no posts to it yet. That isn't even the scenario I have been referring to, but just realized that this is a way I too probably miss a lot of people (who may be newer than me). I do know there really are many unconscious elements to it all. : )
Posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 10:35:39
In reply to Invisibility, posted by gardenergirl on April 27, 2004, at 1:11:37
My opinion on this is the cycle will continue sadly because people do not want to or are unable to see who they flock to. I do not think so many over the course of the time I have been on this site would have posted feeling shunned or invisable...AFTER posting if there wasnt SOME validity to this. I just think people need to look at themself and if they have a habit of posting to say 6 or 10 posters only all the time and toss a free on in to someone else once in a while
Posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 10:58:32
In reply to Re: Invisibility, posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 10:35:39
I think there is validity to this too.
Maybe some people are just chattier than others? I know I can't stop my fingers sometimes. I think I am looking at who's "talking" to each other. If there's a lot going back and forth and I don't have anything different to say, I stay quiet instead of posting a "me too"!
Posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 11:19:37
In reply to Re: Invisibility » Fallen4MyT, posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 10:58:32
See how easy this stuff happens -- for instance, Rainyday, I just posted >> to you above and I'm the only one you didn't answer, ha ha! BUT although I assume that was a fluke, I would also never mean to say that everyone is obligated to answer someone who directs a post to them.
FYI, the (nm) to you above was just this:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/admin/20040307/msgs/339246.html
Posted by Dinah on April 27, 2004, at 11:54:32
In reply to Re: Invisibility about invisibility » rainyday, posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 11:19:37
Now, for instance, in that example, I might well have assumed that it was a no response needed sort of post. Which leads to a new suggestion for those who might feel that way. Some posts sound as if they have a final ring to them, and don't require a response. Others seem like a comment that also aren't inviting further comment. So if you want to increase the chance of getting a reply maybe it's a good idea to include a question in your post. Either a question to the individual you are responding to or a general question.
I've found that in general, I have a hard time finding the end of a conversation. But a question is a clear indication that this is not meant to be an ending sort of statement.
Wow, it feels weird to microanalyze things. But interesting.
Another suggestion. I think that to each of us, our posts are our babies. We put a piece of ourselves in them and send them off into cyberspace, hoping for the best. Hoping they'll find acceptance. While none of us consider *anyone* else's posts in the same fashion.
So my solution has been to just send so many of the little dickens out there so that I know some will fall flat and some will find a comfortable welcome. And enough that I rarely even remember the individual posts, so I'm not overly concerned about their futures. Every once in a while, I post something and then follow its progress with fear and anticipation. But that hurts a bit and is very anxiety provoking. I try not to get too attached to my posts.
Posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 12:11:06
In reply to Re: Invisibility about invisibility » rainyday, posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 11:19:37
I got it (finally)! A bit thick in the head today.
Posted by karen_kay on April 27, 2004, at 13:18:05
In reply to Re: Invisibility about invisibility » spoc, posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 12:11:06
if you notice from the post i start below to kid that says, "hey kid" i started a post to him, yet didn't respond as of yet. however, i responded to ivan micheal. in a day or so, i'll respond to kid. yet, in my response to ivan michael, i made reference to kid's post. (and everyone here knows how much i adore kid, so there's my point precisely).. sheesh, now i really feel bad, so i have to think of something to say to kid... good grief! how can i even top being put in jail on a monday? anyway....
i jump around often. i don't mean to. i'm easily distracted. i can't help that. and i pick and choose the posts i respond to. and i read most posts. but, i don't respond to every post. if i did, i would spend even more time than i do at babble (if that's even possible). it doesn't mean that i don't care any less for the particular poster. i just means that i jump around often. and i don't expect each and every person to respond to me. i often feel bad when people do respond to me, as i can't always get back to them. which is why i try not to start too many threads any more. because i know i can't get back to each individual person.
when i first started posting, i was concerned with the same thing. however, you soon realize you shouldn't be. it's not a matter of people not liking eachother. i like everyone here. i don't purposely not post to anyone. EVER! i just spend way too much time here. and i feel especially rude answering some people and not others. so, i hope that if i answer some, and casually ignore others (much like my problems, hmmm funny how babble mimics real life in that way, isn't it??) somehow i won't feel bad...and it's not that i ignore really, i just write in such a way that i don't really answer or ask questons really. and so when i respond to one person, it actually responds to everyone..
anyway, i always feel bad. always. so, i could devote all of my time to babble. or i could not post at all. or, i could answer some and then make a blanket thank you (which still to me seems rude). or, i can just do what i do, which is to jump around, get to what i have time for and hope no one feels hurt. i try to talk to everyone. i don't ever neglect anyone, i think. if you honestly feel i do, please bring it to my attention, so i can feel bad, even moreso than i already do at this point. i honestlyl feel everyone plays by the same rules i do. i don't think anyone else ignores any other poster on purpose. sometimes i just don't have anything to say about something. i wish sometimes i could pull something insightful out of my butt, however it doesn't always come to me. and again, if it did, i'd be here all the time. and i've never posted anything where i've felt people never posted back recently. maybe it's because people do post back, or perhaps because i just don't have anything important to say. and i kill threads all the time. but, i'd rather kill threads than have someone else kill them.
Posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 13:52:33
In reply to note to all!! i'm rude!, posted by karen_kay on April 27, 2004, at 13:18:05
You have struck a nerve there! But you're not in the least bit rude. I lose track of threads and I'm not certain there is a protocol - or should be - about responding to all who respond to a post. That might be a question for Emily Post!
If anything, you are exceptionally compassionate. Rude is not a word I would EVER use to describe you. Adorable, definitely: but you already know that!
Just think of the few truly offensive posts that crop up now and then - they are caught swiftly and it's obvious to me that we are all looking out for each other.
rainyday
Posted by gardenergirl on April 27, 2004, at 14:26:01
In reply to Re: Invisibility, posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 10:35:39
Fallen4myT,
I'm wondering, since my post was pretty much describing my own habits, if your reply is directed to me?gg
Posted by NikkiT2 on April 27, 2004, at 15:57:53
In reply to Re: Invisibility, posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 10:35:39
Its all part of my social phobia.. its so much easier for me to just talk to those I know, than put myself wide open and post to someone I don't know. But then, I very rarely post here anymore.. when I do it tends ot be on PB2000, where I know the guys very well - but even then, I am so often unable to find words, I simply don't post.
I guess I'm an oldie wimp.. just because I've been here 5 years or so, doesn't mean I'm still not terrified to jump in into conversations etc. And yes, I agree there *are* cliques, and their posts tend to go way over my head... but in my opinion, they tend to be the "medium" timers as I think of them.
So, I don't post to be mean.. I don't post simply as I'm scared or feeling unsafe!
Nikki
Posted by Dr. Bob on April 27, 2004, at 16:01:55
In reply to Re: Invisibility about invisibility » rainyday, posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 11:19:37
> I think people who have been here a long time or are "established" ... don't think about what may be happening to some of the other people... people ... pay little attention to what happens right under their noses.
> people keep talking *around* someone on a thread (often when what they said was something you can be sure would've been responded to if another name accompanied it; and not infrequently when it was even >> directed to someone specific).
>
> Benefit of the doubt can be given that people don't *realize* they do it, but not about *whether* they do it.> I've ... tried to join in speaking about the thing or giggling about it ... and people will still go around a person, clinking their glasses over their head.
> I just posted >> to you above and I'm the only one you didn't answer
I'm sorry if you've felt neglected here, but I need to ask you not to post anything that could lead others to feel accused. It tends to be more civil to talk about how you feel than what others do, for example, by using I-statements.
If you have any questions or comments about this or about posting policies in general, or are interested in alternative ways of expressing yourself, please see the FAQ:
http://www.dr-bob.org/babble/faq.html#civil
or redirect a follow-up to Psycho-Babble Administration.
Posting something about your own issues and their possible role in your reaction might be an interesting exercise -- and might help others respond to you supportively.
----
> this place is supposed to be a little different, and not require people (who may not be up to it) to struggle as hard to be heard and known as they may have to elsewhere.
Someone may or may not have to struggle here. A supportive environment helps, but doesn't necessarily make things easy.
> this ... may just not be a good medium for all... some may do better if they fixed their problems first, but then they probably wouldn't need to be here period, so it's another paradox. Of course nothing can work for everyone, that's just the way it is.
This definitely is not a good medium for all. But it might be a good enough medium if someone's problems are "fixed" enough...
Bob
Posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 17:05:08
In reply to Re: please be civil » spoc, posted by Dr. Bob on April 27, 2004, at 16:01:55
> I'm sorry if you've felt neglected here, but I need to ask you not to post anything that could lead others to feel accused....
<<<< This is one of the selective applications of a PBC, because it is not typical that one is issued when only general board matters are being discussed. This subject may be more sensitive for you than some, but consistency in applying the principles should still be used. Monumental debates and disagreements have taken place on this board at times, with people expressing much disillusionment about it *and* general poster habits. People rarely get PBC-ed unless someone disses or alludes to a particular person. Inconsistent application is not a new or unique thing for someone to point out, but it warrants the explanations that are requested.
> It tends to be more civil to talk about how you feel than what others do, for example, by using I-statements...>
<<<<< I walked the fine line, balanced what I said, did not get personal, and did not come off like it's made to look with those clips.
Posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 18:40:50
In reply to Re: please be civil, posted by spoc on April 27, 2004, at 17:05:08
Spoc I am lost as to how you were uncivil..One could make a case for why saying WE are wrong OR our perception is not right that in itself could be seen as attacking those of us who have or do feel shunned. A LOT of people have said that...we all cant be wrong...I could name about 7 people's screen names (BUT WON'T) who never miss a reply to one another's posts this is what I am talking about...yet they miss or ignore a post STARTED by another poster..thats a clique to my knowledge. I too do not reply to all posts and all threads..no time AND not enough knowledge in some areas and so on....and I do not do "me too". I do not think everyone needs to post to every thread...as Dr Bob I think it was stated that can cause stress..or maybe it was a screen name I dont know who said it..say a social anxiety but being honest with oneself some people may need to look at themselves a bit more and see if they may be ignoring others just to post to a few close buddies...I cannot see that as good for anyone..Just my opinion
> > I'm sorry if you've felt neglected here, but I need to ask you not to post anything that could lead others to feel accused....
>
> <<<< This is one of the selective applications of a PBC, because it is not typical that one is issued when only general board matters are being discussed. This subject may be more sensitive for you than some, but consistency in applying the principles should still be used. Monumental debates and disagreements have taken place on this board at times, with people expressing much disillusionment about it *and* general poster habits. People rarely get PBC-ed unless someone disses or alludes to a particular person. Inconsistent application is not a new or unique thing for someone to point out, but it warrants the explanations that are requested.
>
> > It tends to be more civil to talk about how you feel than what others do, for example, by using I-statements...>
>
> <<<<< I walked the fine line, balanced what I said, did not get personal, and did not come off like it's made to look with those clips.
Posted by Fallen4MyT on April 27, 2004, at 18:55:15
In reply to Re: Invisibility » Fallen4MyT, posted by rainyday on April 27, 2004, at 10:58:32
We are a lot alike in that :-) . But if I see a thread someone started that nobody posted to I will drop in andsay something rather than say chat in threads with those I am closest too...some threads sit...no reply but mine..thats sad
> I think there is validity to this too.
>
> Maybe some people are just chattier than others? I know I can't stop my fingers sometimes. I think I am looking at who's "talking" to each other. If there's a lot going back and forth and I don't have anything different to say, I stay quiet instead of posting a "me too"!
>
Go forward in thread:
Psycho-Babble Social | Extras | FAQ
Dr. Bob is Robert Hsiung, MD,
bob@dr-bob.org
Script revised: February 4, 2008
URL: http://www.dr-bob.org/cgi-bin/pb/mget.pl
Copyright 2006-17 Robert Hsiung.
Owned and operated by Dr. Bob LLC and not the University of Chicago.